mirror of
https://github.com/TerryCavanagh/VVVVVV.git
synced 2024-06-25 05:58:30 +02:00
6a3a1fe147
Apparently in C, if you have `void test();`, it's completely okay to do `test(2);`. The function will take in the argument, but just discard it and throw it away. It's like a trash can, and a rude one at that. If you declare it like `void test(void);`, this is prevented. This is not a problem in C++ - doing `void test();` and `test(2);` is guaranteed to result in a compile error (this also means that right now, at least in all `.cpp` files, nobody is ever calling a void parameter function with arguments and having their arguments be thrown away). However, we may not be using C++ in the future, so I just want to lay down the precedent that if a function takes in no arguments, you must explicitly declare it as such. I would've added `-Wstrict-prototypes`, but it produces an annoying warning message saying it doesn't work in C++ mode if you're compiling in C++ mode. So it can be added later.
29 lines
365 B
C++
29 lines
365 B
C++
#ifndef SOUNDSYSTEM_H
|
|
#define SOUNDSYSTEM_H
|
|
|
|
#include <SDL_mixer.h>
|
|
|
|
class MusicTrack
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
MusicTrack(const char* fileName);
|
|
MusicTrack(SDL_RWops *rw);
|
|
Mix_Music *m_music;
|
|
bool m_isValid;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class SoundTrack
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
SoundTrack(const char* fileName);
|
|
Mix_Chunk *sound;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class SoundSystem
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
SoundSystem(void);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
#endif /* SOUNDSYSTEM_H */
|