mirror of
https://github.com/TerryCavanagh/VVVVVV.git
synced 2024-06-01 18:43:33 +02:00
6a3a1fe147
Apparently in C, if you have `void test();`, it's completely okay to do `test(2);`. The function will take in the argument, but just discard it and throw it away. It's like a trash can, and a rude one at that. If you declare it like `void test(void);`, this is prevented. This is not a problem in C++ - doing `void test();` and `test(2);` is guaranteed to result in a compile error (this also means that right now, at least in all `.cpp` files, nobody is ever calling a void parameter function with arguments and having their arguments be thrown away). However, we may not be using C++ in the future, so I just want to lay down the precedent that if a function takes in no arguments, you must explicitly declare it as such. I would've added `-Wstrict-prototypes`, but it produces an annoying warning message saying it doesn't work in C++ mode if you're compiling in C++ mode. So it can be added later.
51 lines
697 B
C++
51 lines
697 B
C++
#ifndef TEXTBOX_H
|
|
#define TEXTBOX_H
|
|
|
|
#include <SDL.h>
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
class textboxclass
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
textboxclass(void);
|
|
|
|
void centerx(void);
|
|
|
|
void centery(void);
|
|
|
|
void adjust(void);
|
|
|
|
void initcol(int rr, int gg, int bb);
|
|
|
|
void setcol(int rr, int gg, int bb);
|
|
|
|
void update(void);
|
|
|
|
void remove(void);
|
|
|
|
void removefast(void);
|
|
|
|
void resize(void);
|
|
|
|
void addline(std::string t);
|
|
public:
|
|
//Fundamentals
|
|
std::vector<std::string> line;
|
|
int xp, yp, lw, w, h;
|
|
int x,y;
|
|
int r,g,b;
|
|
int tr,tg,tb;
|
|
SDL_Rect textrect;
|
|
int timer;
|
|
|
|
float tl;
|
|
float prev_tl;
|
|
int tm;
|
|
|
|
int max;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
#endif /* TEXTBOX_H */
|