1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/TerryCavanagh/VVVVVV.git synced 2024-11-04 18:29:41 +01:00
Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Misa
1e157f3cc9 De-C++-ify struct ScreenSettings
This includes:
- Removing the constructor in favor of actually being able to see that
  there's an actual function called being made initializing the struct
- Removing the use of a reference in Screen::init() in favor of using a
  pointer
- Adding the struct qualifier everywhere (it's not much typing),
  although technically you could typedef it in C, but I'd rather much
  not typedef just to remove a tag qualifier
2021-12-25 00:30:10 -08:00
Misa
f7b4ac8322 Rename stretch mode to scaling mode internally
It's been long overdue that this variable be named properly. 2.2 added
integer scaling mode (thanks Ethan), 2.3 renamed it to scaling mode. Now
2.4 will properly call it what it is so people won't be confused by it.

The ScreenSettings struct member is renamed from stretch to scalingMode
along with the Screen class member being renamed, as well as the
toggleStretchMode function being renamed to toggleScalingMode as well.
Unfortunately, due to compatibility, we can't change the <stretch> XML
tag.
2021-12-22 19:54:59 -08:00
Misa
c64fd89325 Untabify every single file
YOLO.

This is a repeat of #642. As before, I just did

    rg -l '\t' | xargs -n 1 sed -i -e 's/\t/    /g'

inside the desktop_version/ folder.
2021-09-06 18:56:39 -07:00
Misa
6a3a1fe147
Explicitly declare void for all void parameter functions (#628)
Apparently in C, if you have `void test();`, it's completely okay to do
`test(2);`. The function will take in the argument, but just discard it
and throw it away. It's like a trash can, and a rude one at that. If you
declare it like `void test(void);`, this is prevented.

This is not a problem in C++ - doing `void test();` and `test(2);` is
guaranteed to result in a compile error (this also means that right now,
at least in all `.cpp` files, nobody is ever calling a void parameter
function with arguments and having their arguments be thrown away).
However, we may not be using C++ in the future, so I just want to lay
down the precedent that if a function takes in no arguments, you must
explicitly declare it as such.

I would've added `-Wstrict-prototypes`, but it produces an annoying
warning message saying it doesn't work in C++ mode if you're compiling
in C++ mode. So it can be added later.
2021-02-25 17:23:59 -05:00
Misa
af11f6936a Factor out screen settings to ScreenSettings struct
It's a bit annoying to pass each screen setting individually, would be
nice if we could just wrap it up in a nice struct and pass that instead.
2020-12-18 10:02:18 -05:00