2020-01-01 21:29:24 +01:00
|
|
|
#ifndef MATHGAME_H
|
|
|
|
#define MATHGAME_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//// This header holds Maths functions that emulate the functionality of flash's
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//random
|
|
|
|
//Returns 0..1
|
Explicitly declare void for all void parameter functions (#628)
Apparently in C, if you have `void test();`, it's completely okay to do
`test(2);`. The function will take in the argument, but just discard it
and throw it away. It's like a trash can, and a rude one at that. If you
declare it like `void test(void);`, this is prevented.
This is not a problem in C++ - doing `void test();` and `test(2);` is
guaranteed to result in a compile error (this also means that right now,
at least in all `.cpp` files, nobody is ever calling a void parameter
function with arguments and having their arguments be thrown away).
However, we may not be using C++ in the future, so I just want to lay
down the precedent that if a function takes in no arguments, you must
explicitly declare it as such.
I would've added `-Wstrict-prototypes`, but it produces an annoying
warning message saying it doesn't work in C++ mode if you're compiling
in C++ mode. So it can be added later.
2021-02-25 23:23:59 +01:00
|
|
|
float inline fRandom(void)
|
2020-01-01 21:29:24 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return ( float(rand()) / float(RAND_MAX)) ;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inline int clamp(int x, int a, int b)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return x < a ? a : (x > b ? b : x);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct point
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int x;
|
|
|
|
int y;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif /* MATHGAME_H */
|