c266734448
Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
964 B
964 B
% pandoc -t native
@{https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkwoSDPgg}
@https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkwoSDPgg
^D
[ Para
[ Cite
[ Citation
{ citationId = "https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkwoSDPgg"
, citationPrefix = []
, citationSuffix = []
, citationMode = AuthorInText
, citationNoteNum = 1
, citationHash = 0
}
]
[ Str "@https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkwoSDPgg" ]
]
, Para
[ Cite
[ Citation
{ citationId = "https://openreview.net/forum?id"
, citationPrefix = []
, citationSuffix = []
, citationMode = AuthorInText
, citationNoteNum = 2
, citationHash = 0
}
]
[ Str "@https://openreview.net/forum?id" ]
, Str "=HkwoSDPgg"
]
]
% pandoc -t markdown
@{https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkwoSDPgg}
@https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkwoSDPgg
^D
@{https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkwoSDPgg}
@https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkwoSDPgg