c266734448
Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
995 B
995 B
Test that emojis are wrapped in Span
% pandoc -f commonmark+emoji -t native
My:thumbsup:emoji:heart:
^D
[ Para
[ Str "My"
, Span
( "", [ "emoji" ], [ ( "data-emoji", "thumbsup" ) ] )
[ Str "\128077" ]
, Str "emoji"
, Span
( "", [ "emoji" ], [ ( "data-emoji", "heart" ) ] )
[ Str "\10084\65039" ]
]
]
% pandoc -f markdown+emoji -t native
My:thumbsup:emoji:heart:
^D
[ Para
[ Str "My"
, Span
( "", [ "emoji" ], [ ( "data-emoji", "thumbsup" ) ] )
[ Str "\128077" ]
, Str "emoji"
, Span
( "", [ "emoji" ], [ ( "data-emoji", "heart" ) ] )
[ Str "\10084\65039" ]
]
]
% pandoc -f commonmark+emoji -t html
:zero: header
=============
My:thumbsup:emoji:heart:x :hearts: xyz
^D
<h1><span class="emoji" data-emoji="zero">0️⃣</span> header</h1>
<p>My<span class="emoji" data-emoji="thumbsup">👍</span>emoji<span class="emoji" data-emoji="heart">❤️</span>x <span class="emoji" data-emoji="hearts">♥️</span> xyz</p>