We had previously re-read the native file and converted it to
Powerpoint. But we have already done that in constructing the test
archive. So now we just convert the archive back to a bytestring and
write it to disk.
Previously we had tested certain properties of the output PowerPoint
slides. Corruption, though, comes as the result of a numebr of
interrelated issues in the output pptx archive. This is a new
approach, which compares the output of the Powerpoint writer with
files that we know to (a) not be corrupt, and (b) to show the desired
output behavior (details below). This commit introduces three tests
using the new framework. More will follow.
The test procedure: given a native file and a pptx file, we generate a
pptx archive from the native file, and then test:
1. Whether the same files are in the two archives
2. Whether each of the contained xml files is the same. (We skip time
entries in `docProps/core.xml`, since these are derived from IO. We
just check to make sure that they're there in the same way in both
files.)
3. Whether each of the media files is the same.
Note that steps 2 and 3, though they compare multiple files, are one
test each, since the number of files depends on the input file (if
there is a failure, it will only report the first failed file
comparison in the test failure).
Now list item contents is parsed as blocks,
without resorting to parseFromString.
Only the first line of paragraph has to
be indented now, just like in Emacs Muse
and Text::Amuse.
Definition lists are not refactored yet.
See also: issue #3865.
This is difficult to recreate with a modern version of Word, so I'm
using the file submitted with the bug report. It would be preferable
to find a smaller example with Latin characters, though, so as not to
confuse the issue being tested.
The change both improves performance and fixes a
regression whereby normal citations inside inline notes
were not parsed correctly.
Closesjgm/pandoc-citeproc#315.
Elements with attributes got an additional `attr` accessor. Attributes
were accessible only via the `identifier`, `classes`, and `attributes`,
which was in conflict with the documentation, which indirectly states
that such elements have the an `attr` property.
Every constructor which accepts a list of blocks now also accepts a
single block element for convenience. Furthermore, strings are accepted as
shorthand for `{pandoc.Str "text"}` in constructors.
We had previously defaulted to slideLevel 2. Now we use the correct
behavior of defaulting to the highest level header followed by
content. We change an expected test result to match this behavior.
This gives a pure way to insert an ersatz file into a FileTree.
In addition, we normalize paths both on insertion and on
lookup, so that "foo" and "./foo" will be judged equivalent.
This is the beginning of a test suite for the powerpoint
writer. Initial tests are for the number of slides.
Note that at the moment it does not test against corruption in
Microsoft PowerPoint; it just tests that certain outcomes work as
expected. More tests will be added.
This test framework uses the PandocPure monad introduced with Pandoc 2.0.
The level of headers in included files can be shifted to a higher level
by specifying a minimum header level via the `:minlevel` parameter. E.g.
`#+include: "tour.org" :minlevel 1` will shift the headers in tour.org
such that the topmost headers become level 1 headers.
Fixes: #4154
The org reader test file had grown large, to the point that editor
performance was negatively affected in some cases. The tests are spread
over multiple submodules, and re-combined into a tasty TestTree in the
main org reader test file.
