In the latex parser when includes are processed, the text of the
included file is directly included into the parse stream. This caused
problems when there was an error in the included file (and the included
file was longer than the original file) as the error would be reported
at this position.
The error handling tries to display the line and position where the
error occured. It works by including a copy of the input and finding the
place in the input when given the position of the error. In the
previously described scenario, the input file would be the original
source file but the error position would be the position of the error in
the included file.
The fix is to not try to show the exact line when it would cause an
out-of-bounds error.
The starred variants don't exist.
This helps with part of #3058...it gets rid of the spurious *s.
But we still have numbers on the 4th and 5th level headers.
Previously blockquotes were used. Now a Div is used
with class `admonition` and (if relevant) one of the
following: `attention`, `caution`, `danger`, `error`,
`hint`, `important`, `note`, `tip`, `warning`.
`sidebar` is also put into a Div.
Note: This will change rendering of RST documents!
It should provide much more flexibility.
Closes#3031.
We now handle cell and row attributes, mostly by skipping
them. However, alignments are now handled properly.
Since in pandoc alignment is per-column, not per-cell, we
try to devine column alignments from cell alignments.
Table captions are also now parsed, and textile indicators
for thead and tfoot no longer cause parse failure. (However,
a row designated as tfoot will just be a regular row in pandoc.)
Previously, we had used the user-supplied date, if available, for Word's
document creation metadata. This could lead to weird results, as in
cases where the user post-dates a document (so the modification might be
prior to the creation). Here we use the actual computer time to set the
document creation.
Previously we parsed a list of dates, took the first one, and then
tested its year range. That meant that if the first one failed, we
returned nothing, regardless of what the others did. Now we test for
sanity before running `msum` over the list of Maybe values. Anything
failing the test will be Nothing, so will not be a candidate.
