66 lines
3.4 KiB
TeX
66 lines
3.4 KiB
TeX
|
\chapter{A Deal with Life}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Life is one of the most beautiful things in the universe. Arguably,
|
||
|
|
it is because we humans belong to the kingdom of Life that it
|
||
|
|
fascinates us so. Beyond its intrinsic beauty to which our sensory
|
||
|
|
organs are attuned, it also deeply attracts us because of the
|
||
|
|
self-referentiality of its contemplation: when thinking about Life, we
|
||
|
|
often think about our interactions with it, and ultimately
|
||
|
|
about ourselves.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Self-referentiality is also a hurdle: it is intrinsically difficult to
|
||
|
|
conceive of oneself. Even though theoretical computer science is no
|
||
|
|
substitute for philosophy, I enjoy taking Gödel's incompleteness
|
||
|
|
theorems\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel's_incompleteness_theorems}}
|
||
|
|
and especially Hilbert's
|
||
|
|
\emph{Entscheidungsproblem}\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entscheidungsproblem}}
|
||
|
|
and the halting
|
||
|
|
problem\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem}}
|
||
|
|
as vivid examples: Turing's famous proof states that a Turing machine
|
||
|
|
cannot generally decide whether another Turing machine will ever halt.
|
||
|
|
Since abstract computing devices can be seen as distant
|
||
|
|
mathematizations of the human brain, this formal result hints that
|
||
|
|
entirely conceiving of our mind---and by extension of Life itself---is
|
||
|
|
borderline intractable.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The difficulty of self-referiantiality is also deeply disturbing,
|
||
|
|
especially because understanding how our bodies function within their
|
||
|
|
environments has so many essential implications: dealing with the
|
||
|
|
climate crisis, tackling diseases, improving the quality of life, to
|
||
|
|
only cite the foremost ones. To avoid the worry of looking into the
|
||
|
|
mirror for too long, one can brutally build a wall between oneself and
|
||
|
|
``the rest'' of Life, and adopt what may be called the Engineer's
|
||
|
|
position: a living organism is a machine constituted out of mechanical
|
||
|
|
pieces, whilst the human disassembles, adjusts, and reassembles them
|
||
|
|
again, improved.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Modern biology, medicine, biotechnology illustrate the high
|
||
|
|
performance of the Engineer's approach, and this text is not
|
||
|
|
a criticism of mechanicism per se. Nevertheless, its efficiency does
|
||
|
|
not entail total truthfulness, nor even exclusivity about truth.
|
||
|
|
In other words, mechanistic views allowing for impressive technical
|
||
|
|
achievements does not mean that these views fully reflect reality, nor
|
||
|
|
that mechanicism is the final stop on our journey to understanding
|
||
|
|
Life. In my research, I aim for exploring different approaches to
|
||
|
|
Life and tools supporting such approaches. I take particular
|
||
|
|
enthusiasm in thinking about striking \emph{a deal with Life}:
|
||
|
|
establishing \emph{mutually beneficial} interactions with living
|
||
|
|
systems.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Concluding deals as opposed to taking the Engineer's position resets
|
||
|
|
the power balance in our relationship with Life: instead of seeking to
|
||
|
|
control, hack, or otherwise dominate living organisms, the goal is to
|
||
|
|
further take into account their well-being. I believe that
|
||
|
|
approaching Life from this viewpoint is essential if we are after true
|
||
|
|
solutions to fundamental problems such as the climate crisis or
|
||
|
|
complex diseases. On a more philosophical note, the framework of
|
||
|
|
mutually beneficial interactions should remind us that our
|
||
|
|
intelligence in no way warrants an extraction of the human being into
|
||
|
|
an exceptional superior stance---we are part of Life, and we ought to
|
||
|
|
think and act accordingly.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%% Local Variables:
|
||
|
|
%%% TeX-engine: luatex
|
||
|
|
%%% TeX-master: "hdr"
|
||
|
|
%%% End:
|