example | ||
functions.rkt | ||
generic.rkt | ||
info.rkt | ||
LICENSE | ||
networks.rkt | ||
README.org | ||
rs.rkt | ||
utils.rkt |
- dds: A Home-made Toolkit for Discrete Dynamical Systems in Racket
- Roadmap
- Write new functions for building the interaction graphs
- Add variable domains to the network
- Review
build-interaction-graph
- Start writing the docs properly with Scribble
- Think about not using generics for the dynamics
- Convert
dds
to Typed Racket - Split
networks
into general networks and threshold Boolean networks - Submit
update-graph
tostchang
- Implement the BN → RS conversion
- Implement the minimisation of TBF/SBF
- Contribute to Racket
- Test network inference with Racklog
- Roadmap
dds: A Home-made Toolkit for Discrete Dynamical Systems in Racket
This is a toolkit for playing with various discrete dynamical systems in Racket. A discrete dynamical system is a system which evolves from a discrete state to some other discrete states (many or one). The systems are discrete in the sense that we can identify successive states with no other states in between. Equivalently, the phase state of the system is discrete (and is often called the state graph). These constraints imply the possibility of associating discrete, possibly branching timelines to any evolution of the system.
DISCLAIMER: I develop this toolkit as a support for my research on discrete dynamical systems. The primary objective for this framework is to fit my approach to these systems. Essentially, this framework should fit to the "shape of my mind", which is not necessarily the same as yours.
Currently, the toolkit includes the following files:
- generic.rkt: The generic interface for a discrete dynamical system, with functions for constructing state graphs.
- utils.rkt: Misc utility functions.
- networks.rkt: Implements network-based models, which generalise Boolean networks, threshold Boolean automata networks, multivalued networks, etc.
- rs.rkt: Implements reaction systems, a variant of set rewriting.
The toolkit is designed with Emacs Org-mode interoperability in mind. The file example/example.org explains the features available for interaction with Org-mode.
Roadmap
Here is my current roadmap for this toolkit, in order. The first element is what I am currently working on. The degree of certainty that I work on the subsequent items decreases with their position in the list.
TODO Write new functions for building the interaction graphs
variables-interact?
get-interaction-sign
build-interaction-graph
I currently have two different kinds of function for building
interaction graphs: the syntactic interaction graphs and the
interaction graphs as typically defined in the papers. These two
kinds of graphs are not exactly the same. I have already started
marking the split by renaming the original
build-interaction-graph
to build-syntactic-interaction-graph
.
The other functions are somewhat badly structured, somewhat badly
written, and potentially somewhat wrong.
TODO Add variable domains to the network
I currently define a network as a mapping from variables to functions, but in fact I very often need the domains of the variables for very many operations.
I started this transformation a couple of days ago, and decided against it, because I thought that some networks may have unbounded domains. That's right, but stays hypothetical, while right now I need domains with my networks all the time.
TODO
Review build-interaction-graph
Check that the definition of this function really follows the definition of the interaction graph. Pay attention to the existential vs. universal quantifiers.
TODO Start writing the docs properly with Scribble
Convert some of the comments to Scribble, in particular module-level comments introducing the modules and each of the sections.
Set up the infrastructure for extracting the in-source comments using this.
TODO Think about not using generics for the dynamics
Typed Racket can now type classes, and I can implement the idea
from the module generics
as a class. However, I got this advice
on Racket Users group:
If you don't need to support arbitrary user implementations, you can avoid generics and classes altogether and use structs whose fields contain functions.
I will need to think about simpler implementations of the interface to dynamics, which should also be simpler to type.
TODO
Convert dds
to Typed Racket
This will necessarily lead to updates in the comments, which should be rewritten with Scribble.
I will do the conversion in the directory typed/
, by
incrementally translating existing modules, definition
by definition.
The order I will convert the modules:
utils
functions
- the module defining the interface to dynamics (currently
generics
) networks
rs
TODO
Split networks
into general networks and threshold Boolean networks
TODO
Submit update-graph
to stchang
TODO Implement the BN → RS conversion
TODO Implement the minimisation of TBF/SBF
TODO Contribute to Racket
- Make sequence-filter allow multivalued sequences, provided the arity of the predicate is consistent with the arity of the sequence.
- Add a sequence->hash function that accepts a multivalued sequence of keys and values (exactly like what in-hash produces) and copies them into a hash table.