networks: Fix and simplify the comment of Inferring interaction graphs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ece1f6c88
commit
60be01d979
1 changed files with 2 additions and 10 deletions
12
networks.rkt
12
networks.rkt
|
@ -278,19 +278,11 @@
|
|||
;;; Inferring interaction graphs
|
||||
;;; ============================
|
||||
|
||||
;;; I allow any syntactic forms in definitions of Boolean functions.
|
||||
;;; I can still find out which Boolean variables appear in those
|
||||
;;; syntactic form, but I have no reliable syntactic means of finding
|
||||
;;; out what kind of action do they have (inhibition or activation)
|
||||
;;; since I cannot do Boolean minimisation (e.g., I cannot rely on not
|
||||
;;; appearing before a variable, since (not (not a)) is equivalent
|
||||
;;; to a). On the other hand, going through all Boolean states is
|
||||
;;; quite resource-consuming and thus not always useful.
|
||||
;;;
|
||||
;;; In this section I provide inference of both unsigned and signed
|
||||
;;; interaction graphs, but since the inference of signed interaction
|
||||
;;; graphs is based on analysing the dynamics of the networks, it may
|
||||
;;; be quite resource-consuming.
|
||||
;;; be quite resource-consuming, especially since I allow any
|
||||
;;; syntactic forms in the definitions of the functions.
|
||||
|
||||
;;; Lists the variables of the network form appearing in the update
|
||||
;;; function form for x.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue