This is a reasonably simple attempt at fixing #460.
By moving the accept check to a place before the body check,
we can make it recoverable (the body check is irreversible,
so everything done after the body check has to fail fatally).
The advantage is that we can now specify routes offering
different content types modularly. Failure to match one
is not fatal, and will result in subsequent routes being
tried.
The disadvantage is that we hereby bump the error priority
of the 406 status code. If a request contains a bad accept
header and a bad body, we now get 406 rather than 400. This
deviates from the HTTP decision diagram we try to follow,
but seems like an acceptable compromise for now.
This introduces a `Delayed` type in `RoutingApplication.hs` that
contains a handler together with delayed checks. There are several
blocks of delayed checks, so that we can ultimately execute them in the
order we desire.
The process is documented in more detail in `RoutingApplication.hs`.
