This is a reasonably simple attempt at fixing #460.
By moving the accept check to a place before the body check,
we can make it recoverable (the body check is irreversible,
so everything done after the body check has to fail fatally).
The advantage is that we can now specify routes offering
different content types modularly. Failure to match one
is not fatal, and will result in subsequent routes being
tried.
The disadvantage is that we hereby bump the error priority
of the 406 status code. If a request contains a bad accept
header and a bad body, we now get 406 rather than 400. This
deviates from the HTTP decision diagram we try to follow,
but seems like an acceptable compromise for now.
We've previously used functions in the Router type to provide
information for subrouters. But this accesses the Requests too
early, and breaks sharing of the router structure in general,
causing the Router or large parts of the Router to be recomputed
on every request.
We now do not use functions anymore, and properly compute all
static parts of the router first, and gain access to the request
only in Delayed.
This also turns the code used within Delayed into a proper monad
now called DelayedIO, making some of the code using it a bit
nicer.
* Improves how Routers are built, in particular via
the `choice` smart constructors. Static lookups are
now used more often.
* We now have test cases making sure that certain
routers have the same structure.
* The router structure can now be visualized for debugging
purposes as a tree. The new functions `layout` and
`layoutWithContext` do this.
This introduces a `Delayed` type in `RoutingApplication.hs` that
contains a handler together with delayed checks. There are several
blocks of delayed checks, so that we can ultimately execute them in the
order we desire.
The process is documented in more detail in `RoutingApplication.hs`.
