Previously we got a crash, because we were trying to print
a native cmark STRIKETHROUGH node, and the commonmark writer
in cmark-github doesn't support this. Work around this by
using a raw node to add the strikethrough delimiters.
Closes#4038.
* Move as much as possible to the CSS in the template.
* Ensure that all the HTML-based templates (including epub)
contain the CSS for columns.
* Columns default to 50% width unless they are given a width
attribute.
Closes#4028.
* Remove "width" attribute which is not allowed on div.
* Remove space between `<div class="column">` elements,
since this prevents columns whose widths sum to 100%
(the space takes up space).
Closes#4028.
and other non-HTML formats (`Text.Pandoc.Readers.HTML.htmlTag`).
The parser stopped at the first `>` character, even if it wasn't
the end of the comment.
Closes#4019.
Previously `\include` wouldn't work if the included file
contained, e.g., a begin without a matching end.
We've changed the Tok type so that it stores a full SourcePos,
rather than just a line and column. So tokens keeep track
of the file they came from. This allows us to use a simpler
method for includes, which doesn't require parsing the included
document as a whole.
Closes#3971.
* Options: Added readerStripComments to ReaderOptions.
* Added `--strip-comments` command-line option.
* Made `htmlTag` from the HTML reader sensitive to this feature.
This affects Markdown and Textile input.
Closes#2552.
Div's are difficult to translate into org syntax, as there are multiple
div-like structures (drawers, special blocks, greater blocks) which all
have their advantages and disadvantages. Previously pandoc would
use raw HTML to preserve the full div information; this was rarely
useful and resulted in visual clutter. Div-rendering was changed to
discard the div's classes and key-value pairs if there is no natural way
to translate the div into an org structure.
Closes: #3771
Closes#3511.
Previously pandoc used the four-space rule: continuation paragraphs,
sublists, and other block level content had to be indented 4
spaces. Now the indentation required is determined by the
first line of the list item: to be included in the list item,
blocks must be indented to the level of the first non-space
content after the list marker. Exception: if are 5 or more spaces
after the list marker, then the content is interpreted as an
indented code block, and continuation paragraphs must be indented
two spaces beyond the end of the list marker. See the CommonMark
spec for more details and examples.
Documents that adhere to the four-space rule should, in most cases,
be parsed the same way by the new rules. Here are some examples
of texts that will be parsed differently:
- a
- b
will be parsed as a list item with a sublist; under the four-space
rule, it would be a list with two items.
- a
code
Here we have an indented code block under the list item, even though it
is only indented six spaces from the margin, because it is four spaces
past the point where a continuation paragraph could begin. With the
four-space rule, this would be a regular paragraph rather than a code
block.
- a
code
Here the code block will start with two spaces, whereas under
the four-space rule, it would start with `code`. With the four-space
rule, indented code under a list item always must be indented eight
spaces from the margin, while the new rules require only that it
be indented four spaces from the beginning of the first non-space
text after the list marker (here, `a`).
This change was motivated by a slew of bug reports from people
who expected lists to work differently (#3125, #2367, #2575, #2210,
#1990, #1137, #744, #172, #137, #128) and by the growing prevalance
of CommonMark (now used by GitHub, for example).
Users who want to use the old rules can select the `four_space_rule`
extension.
* Added `four_space_rule` extension.
* Added `Ext_four_space_rule` to `Extensions`.
* `Parsing` now exports `gobbleAtMostSpaces`, and the type
of `gobbleSpaces` has been changed so that a `ReaderOptions`
parameter is not needed.
Acronyms are not resolved by the reader, but acronym and glossary information is put into attributes on Spans so that they can be processed in filters.
The structure expected is:
<div class="columns">
<div class="column" width="40%">
contents...
</div>
<div class="column" width="60%">
contents...
</div>
</div>
Support has been added for beamer and all HTML slide formats.
Closes#1710.
Note: later we could add a more elegant way to create
this structure in Markdown than to use raw HTML div elements.
This would come for free with a "native div syntax" (#168).
Or we could devise something specific to slides
