- Adds a new `pandoc.AttributeList()` constructor, which creates the
associative attribute list that is used as the third component of
`Attr` values. Values of this type can often be passed to constructors
instead of `Attr` values.
- `AttributeList` values can no longer be indexed numerically.
The new HsLua version takes a somewhat different approach to marshalling
and unmarshalling, relying less on typeclasses and more on specialized
types. This allows for better performance and improved error messages.
Furthermore, new abstractions allow to document the code and exposed
functions.
Previously pandoc would parse
[link to (@a)](url)
as a citation; similarly
[(@a)]{#ident}
This is undesirable. One should be able to use example references
in citations, and even if `@a` is not defined as an example
reference, `[@a](url)` should be a link containing an author-in-text
citation rather than a normal citation followed by literal `(url)`.
Closes#7632.
Some fields only have an instrText and no content, Pandoc didn't
understand these, causing other fields to be misunderstood because it
seemed like a field was still open when it wasn't.
Fields delimited by fldChar elements can contain other fields. Before,
the nested fields would be ignored, except for the end, which would be
considered the end of the parent field.
To fix this issue, fields needed to be considered containing ParParts
instead of Runs, since a Run can't represent complex enough structures.
This also impacted Hyperlinks since they can originate from a field.
This commit changes the `marL` and `indent` values used for plain
paragraphs and numbered lists, and changes the spacing defined in the
reference doc master for bulleted lists.
For paragraphs, there is now a left-indent taken from the `otherStyle`
in the master. For numbered lists, the number is positioned where the
text would be if this were a plain paragraph, and the text is indented
to the next level. This means that continuation paragraphs line up
nicely with numbered lists.
It also /mostly/ matches the observed PowerPoint behaviour when
inserting paragraphs and numbered lists: the only difference is that
PowerPoint was using a different margin value for the first level
numbered lists – I’ve changed this to match the other levels, as I don’t
think it makes the spacing unappealing and it allows continuation
paragraphs at any level to line up.
With bulleted lists, I’m keeping the observed PowerPoint behaviour of
specifying only a level, letting `marL` and `indent` be automatically
taken from `bodyStyle`. To that end, this commit changes the `bodyStyle`
spacing in the master of the default reference doc, to:
- line up the text of the first paragraph in each bullet with any
continuation paragraphs
- line up nested bullet markers in any continuation paragraphs with the
first paragraph, matching lists and plain paragraphs
This does mean the continuation paragraphs still won’t line up for
anyone using their own reference doc where they haven’t matched the
`otherStyle` and `bodyStyle` indent levels, but I think people in that
situation will be able to troubleshoot.
In PowerPoint, the content of a top-level list is at the same level as
the content of a top-level paragraph – the only difference is that a
list style has been applied.
At the moment, the pptx writer increments the paragraph level on each
list, turning what should be top-level lists into second-level lists.
This commit changes that logic, only incrementing the paragraph level on
continuation paragraphs of lists.
- Fixes https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/4828
- Fixes https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/4663
This fixes a regression in #7604, which modernized
babel usage but omitted to load babel for pdflatex,
with the result that even simple documents could no
longer be produced.
Closes#7627.
AsciiDoctor allows to request line numbering on code blocks by
using a switch on the `source` block, such as in:
```
[source%linesnum,haskell]
----
some Haskell code here
----
```
When a paragraph has an indentation different from the parent (named)
style, it used to be considered a blockquote. But this only makes sense
when the paragraph has more indentation. So this commit adds a check
for the indentation of the parent style.
When I added the tests for moved layouts and deleted layouts, I added
them to all tests. However, this doesn’t really give a lot more info
than having single tests, and the extra tests take up time and disk
space.
This commit removes the moved-layouts and deleted-layouts tests, in
favour of a single test for each of those scenarios.
Update tests.
Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by
pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader.
According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99
it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values
be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our
purposes.
pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents
(non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this
produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests.
Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard.
Closes#7580.
Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't
really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization
format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader
is so much faster than native.)
Previously polyglossia worked better with xelatex, but
that is no longer the case, so we simplify the code so that
babel is used with all latex engines.
This involves a change to the default LaTeX template.
In PowerPoint, it’s possible to specify footers across all slides,
containing a date (optionally automatically updated to today’s date),
the slide number (optionally starting from a higher number than 1), and
static text. There’s also an option to hide the footer on the title
slide.
Before this commit, none of that footer content was pulled through from
the reference doc: this commit supports all the functionality listed
above.
There is one behaviour which may not be immediately obvious: if the
reference doc specifies a fixed date (i.e. not automatically updating),
and there’s a date specified in the metadata for the document, the
footer date is replaced by the metadata date.
- Include date, slide number, and static footer content from reference
doc
- Respect “slide number starts from” option
- Respect “Don’t show on title slide” option
- Add tests
We previously indented them by two spaces, following a
common convention. Since the convention is fading, and
the indentation is inconvenient for copy/paste, we are
discontinuing this practice.
Closes#5440.
In the reveal-js output, it’s possible to use reveal’s
`data-background-image` class on a slide’s title to specify a background
image for the slide.
With this commit, it’s possible to use `background-image` in the same
way for pptx output. Only the “stretch” mode is supported, and the
background image is centred around the slide in the image’s larger axis,
matching the observed default behaviour of PowerPoint.
- Support `background-image` per slide.
- Add tests.
- Update manual.
- Support -i option
- Support incremental/noincremental divs
- Support older block quote syntax
- Add tests
One thing not clear from the manual is what should happen when the input
uses a combination of these things. For example, what should the
following produce?
```md
::: {.incremental .nonincremental}
- are
- these
- incremental?
:::
::: incremental
::::: nonincremental
- or
- these?
:::::
:::
::: nonincremental
> - how
> - about
> - these?
:::
```
In this commit I’ve taken the following approach, matching the observed
behaviour for beamer and reveal.js output:
- if a div with both classes, incremental wins
- the innermost incremental/nonincremental div is the one which takes
effect
- a block quote containing a list as its first element inverts whether
the list is incremental, whether or not the quote is inside an
incremental/non-incremental div
I’ve added some tests to verify this behaviour.
This commit closes issue #5689
(https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/5689).
There was a mistake in the logic used to choose between the Comparison
and Two Content layouts: if one column contained only non-text (an image
or a table) and the other contained only text, the Comparison layout was
chosen instead of the desired Two Content layout.
This commit fixes that logic:
> If either column contains text followed by non-text, use Comparison.
Otherwise, use Two Content.
It also adds a test asserting this behaviour.
If the image has the id IMAGEID, then we use the id ref_IMAGEID
for the figure number. Closes#7551.
This allows one to create a filter that adds a figure number
with figure name, e.g.
<w:fldSimple w:instr=" REF ref_superfig "><w:r><w:t>Figure X</w:t></w:r></w:fldSimple>
For this to be possible it must be possible to predict the
figure number id from the image id.
If images lack an id, an id of the form `ref_fig1` is used.
- Accept test changes: they’re adding the second theme (for all tests
not containing speaker notes), or changing its position in the
XML (for the ones containing speaker notes).
