pandoc/test/command/latex-fontawesome.md

```
% pandoc -f latex -t native
Check: \faCheck
^D
[ Para [ Str "Check:" , Space , Str "\10003" ] ]
```

```
% pandoc -f latex -t native
Close: \faClose
^D
[ Para [ Str "Close:" , Space , Str "\10007" ] ]
```
Support for \faCheck and \faClose (#3727) 2017-06-11 07:47:42 +02:00			```
			`% pandoc -f latex -t native`
			`Check: \faCheck`
			`^D`
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback. 2021-09-28 21:17:53 -07:00			`[ Para [ Str "Check:" , Space , Str "\10003" ] ]`
Support for \faCheck and \faClose (#3727) 2017-06-11 07:47:42 +02:00			```

			```
			`% pandoc -f latex -t native`
			`Close: \faClose`
			`^D`
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback. 2021-09-28 21:17:53 -07:00			`[ Para [ Str "Close:" , Space , Str "\10007" ] ]`
Support for \faCheck and \faClose (#3727) 2017-06-11 07:47:42 +02:00			```