Tissevert/pandoc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
pandoc/test/command/7155.md

34 lines
481 B
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

Add test for #7155.
2021-03-17 17:02:20 +01:00
```
% pandoc -f markdown+tex_math_single_backslash -t native
\(x\) \[x\]
\\(x\\) \\[x\\]
^D
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
[ Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Math InlineMath "x"
, Space
, Math DisplayMath "x"
, SoftBreak
, Str "\\(x\\)"
, Space
, Str "\\[x\\]"
]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
]
Add test for #7155.
2021-03-17 17:02:20 +01:00
```
```
% pandoc -f markdown+tex_math_double_backslash -t native
\(x\) \[x\]
\\(x\\) \\[x\\]
^D
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
[ Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Str "(x)"
, Space
, Str "[x]"
, SoftBreak
, Math InlineMath "x"
, Space
, Math DisplayMath "x"
]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
]
Add test for #7155.
2021-03-17 17:02:20 +01:00
```
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink