Tissevert/pandoc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
pandoc/test/docbook-chapter.native

174 lines
2.9 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
Pandoc
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
Meta { unMeta = fromList [] }
[ Header
1 ( "" , [] , [] ) [ Str "Test" , Space , Str "Chapter" ]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
, Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Str "This"
, Space
, Str "chapter"
, Space
, Str "uses"
, Space
, Str "recursive"
, Space
, Str "sections."
]
, Header
2
( "" , [] , [] )
[ Str "Like" , Space , Str "a" , Space , Str "Sect1" ]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
, Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Str "This"
, Space
, Str "section"
, Space
, Str "is"
, Space
, Str "like"
, Space
, Str "a"
, Space
, Str "Sect1."
]
, Header
3
( "" , [] , [] )
[ Str "Like" , Space , Str "a" , Space , Str "Sect2" ]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
, Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Str "This"
, Space
, Str "section"
, Space
, Str "is"
, Space
, Str "like"
, Space
, Str "a"
, Space
, Str "Sect2."
]
, Header
4
( "" , [] , [] )
[ Str "Like" , Space , Str "a" , Space , Str "Sect3" ]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
, Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Str "This"
, Space
, Str "section"
, Space
, Str "is"
, Space
, Str "like"
, Space
, Str "a"
, Space
, Str "Sect3."
]
, Header
5
( "" , [] , [] )
[ Str "Like" , Space , Str "a" , Space , Str "Sect4" ]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
, Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Str "This"
, Space
, Str "section"
, Space
, Str "is"
, Space
, Str "like"
, Space
, Str "a"
, Space
, Str "Sect4."
]
, Header
6
( "" , [] , [] )
[ Str "Like" , Space , Str "a" , Space , Str "Sect5" ]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
, Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Str "This"
, Space
, Str "section"
, Space
, Str "is"
, Space
, Str "like"
, Space
, Str "a"
, Space
, Str "Sect5."
]
, Header
7
( "" , [] , [] )
[ Str "Would"
, Space
, Str "be"
, Space
, Str "like"
, Space
, Str "a"
, Space
, Str "Sect6"
]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
, Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Str "This"
, Space
, Str "section"
, Space
, Str "would"
, Space
, Str "be"
, Space
, Str "like"
, Space
, Str "a"
, Space
, Str "Sect6,"
, Space
, Str "if"
, Space
, Str "there"
, Space
, Str "was"
, Space
, Str "one."
]
, Header
8
( "" , [] , [] )
[ Str "Would"
, Space
, Str "be"
, Space
, Str "like"
, Space
, Str "a"
, Space
, Str "Sect7"
]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
, Para
Switch from pretty-simple to pretty-show for native output. Update tests. Reason: it turns out that the native output generated by pretty-simple isn't always readable by the native reader. According to https://github.com/cdepillabout/pretty-simple/issues/99 it is not a design goal of the library that the rendered values be readable using 'read'. This makes it unsuitable for our purposes. pretty-show is a bit slower and it uses 4-space indents (non-configurable), but it doesn't have this serious drawback.
2021-09-29 06:17:53 +02:00
[ Str "This"
, Space
, Str "section"
, Space
, Str "would"
, Space
, Str "be"
, Space
, Str "like"
, Space
, Str "a"
, Space
, Str "Sect7,"
, Space
, Str "if"
, Space
, Str "there"
, Space
, Str "was"
, Space
, Str "one."
]
Use pretty-simple to format native output. Previously we used our own homespun formatting. But this produces over-long lines that aren't ideal for diffs in tests. Easier to use something off-the-shelf and standard. Closes #7580. Performance is slower by about a factor of 10, but this isn't really a problem because native isn't suitable as a serialization format. (For serialization you should use json, because the reader is so much faster than native.)
2021-09-19 21:09:51 +02:00
]
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink